|click to enlarge|
While we accomplished much and built a huge resource library, we've never had consistent funding or significant leadership support from Chicago business, political, philanthropic or other sectors. Thus, what we wanted to accomplish is far less than what has been needed.
Data collection and GIS mapping have been at the heart of T/MC work since 1993. This graphic shows what the T/MC has been trying to do and what has not ever been accomplished.
|Annual cycle of Tutor/Mentor Connection mapping. Click to enlarge|
I created this Wiki Page to show what we were trying to accomplish. Feel free to read it and offer your help.
When we started building a mapping capacity, and on-line program locator, the goal was that we could do more to support the fund raising capacity of programs in different parts of the city. There were three goals that never have been reached.
|click here to view|
My vision was that we could create a form that would be accepted by grant makers, to show the need for tutor/mentor programs serving different age levels in different zip codes and/or community areas. Right now every program has to build their own case statement showing why it is important for their program to receive funding. Some have greater talent to do this than others. It's a redundant process. Thus, creating a form where you'd only need to enter a zipcode or community area, plus the age group you serve, and the type of program you offer, should generate a report showing that you are needed in that area.
7-29-2022 update - below is a video created by a company called RS21 who is building data mapping dashboards and using the data in an analysis process that determines where services are needed and where to put them. View the video at this link. View other articles showing RS21 use of data - click here.
I point to the RS21 video because this is the type of analysis that was envisioned in 1993 when we began to plan the Tutor/Mentor Connection and it's use of maps. We never reached the capacity to do this in all the ways imagined.
If we had fully developed this capacity, it would have lowered the cost to individual programs and give grant makers a consistent way to help them decide where to provide funding and who to support in each area.
|click here to view|
We got partially there in 2004 when we launched this on-line searchable program locator form (since 2022 only available as an archive). However, the maps that this produced did not show demographic information or indicators such as poorly performing schools or violence. The Interactive Program Locator that was built in 2008 provided this information. However, there was no "easy to use" narrative generated in a "form" that could be printed that someone could pull from the site and use in a grant proposal.
The financial melt down starting in 2008 led to this work being discontinued in 2009 and to updates being discontinued by 2013.
So this is one bridge that we never were able to cross.
2) Motivating programs to provide data for the Tutor/Mentor Program Locator and keep it updated has always been a challenge. One way we partially overcame that was to have our annual survey included in the grant guidelines of the Chicago Bar Foundation's Lawyer's Lend A Hand Program. About 40 out of our list of nearly 200 programs submitted applications each year from 1995-20003 which I could use to update the list. However, that was too few and too time consuming for my small staff. Thus as we built the interactive portal in 2004 we developed an on-line form that programs could use to add themselves or update their data (not working since 2013). However, this still did not provide "motivation".
|click to enlarge|
My answer is shown in this PDF. The graphic at the right is part of it. As on-line fund raising portals grew since the mid 2000s I felt that we might create a portal that would work with the Program Locator maps, to encourage donors to support programs in different parts of Chicago and give media a resource to use in developing stories following incidents of violence, reports on schools, reports on gangs, etc.
On one level, we could draw from the list we were maintaining to give donors info to create the platform. However, on another level we felt that as programs began to generate donations, and learned to use the site to build their own campaigns, we'd create greater motivation to keep their data updated. We could even organize events at different time in each year to draw volunteers and donors to the platform.
This is another bridge that has not been crossed. This has never gotten further than me putting the idea into this PPT and sharing it on my planning wiki.
|click to enlarge|
3) The final bridge - As we developed the Tutor/Mentor Connection in the 1990s we felt we could generate income to support our continued operations and innovation by making it available to other cities and offering our expertise to help them use it. When I formed the Tutor/Mentor Institute, LLC that continued to be the goal. However, that has not happened. Now my goal is to find people who will take time to understand what I've been trying to do and will want to take ownership and carry it into the future. One idea that might offer promise is to make the code for the Program Locator and any new platforms freely available on GitHub, so it could be more easily applied in other cities, and to other causes. That might attract more developers to help build in the features I've not been able to construct, and to keep updating it as technology and needs change. Having parallel portals in every major city of the US and the world would certainly contribute to greater visibility and greater traffic, and thus a bigger flow of donations through the portal and the maps to individual tutor/mentor programs in different places.
That's always been the goal. So far it's still a bridge to far to cross.
Does any of this interest you? I'm on Twitter, Linkedin and Facebook. Let's connect.